The movie starts with a compilation of information clips with anchors speaking about Trump’s standing in the entire world right before exhibiting the NATO online video, alongside with Biden’s voice from a speech stating “The world sees Trump for what he is, insincere, ill-educated, corrupt, dangerously incompetent and incapable, in my view, of environment management.”
The video clip highlights Biden’s method of portray Trump as unfit to guide on the globe phase. Aspect of Biden’s pitch to voters is that he is the greatest outfitted to restore associations with US allies as a former vice president and chair of the Senate International Relations Committee.
The previous vice president cited the NATO video when talking at an occasion in Ames, Iowa, previously Wednesday to make the case “individuals are nervous all over the world” with Trump in business office.
“You observed what is actually recently happened, you heard the reviews, I failed to see them, I just noticed the stories currently, the place our NATO allies caught off guard making exciting of the President of the United States of The usa,” Biden claimed. “When is that, did you ever imagine you would see that take place? Ever? And it matters to us. It issues to our stability. But it receives back to standard fundamental values. And in which are those values rooted?”
The remarks echo Biden’s remarks to CNN’s Don Lemon past thirty day period faulting Trump for “shredding our alliances.”
“Vladimir Putin is aware I know him, and he is aware of me. And the fact is that this is what is wanted on day a person,” Biden reported. “We are in hassle. We are in issues. This President is shredding our alliances. This President is yielding to Putin in strategies that are obsequious.”
Wednesday’s online video was produced 30 minutes following Trump landed back again on American soil, retaining in line with Biden’s typically cited principle of not criticizing a president whilst they’re overseas.
“I hardly ever say just about anything destructive about a president whilst he — a unique overseas coverage difficulty — though that president is abroad,” Biden mentioned in Ames.
In a video filmed at Buckingham Palace’s NATO reception on Tuesday night, the Queen — together with Prince Charles and Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall — is noticed shaking palms with Trump and his spouse Melania.
The 93-year-aged monarch then appears to be like in excess of, seemingly to verify which earth leader she is because of to get next, right before noticing her daughter standing in the background by the doorway.
Queen Elizabeth says one thing inaudible in the direction of Anne in the distance, just before the Princess Royal shrugs and can be listened to replying: “It is really just me,” just before introducing: “and this ton,” as the group around the Queen chuckle.
In accordance to Britain’s PA Media news company, Princess Anne was pointing to associates of the royal household, which includes the Deputy Grasp of the Residence, Lt. Col. Anthony Charles Richards, and William Peel, the Lord Chamberlain.
It was not prolonged just before “Princess Anne” was the leading pattern on Twitter on Tuesday.
Some social media users prompt that the Queen was “scolding” Anne for not greeting the president, but only Charles and Camilla were being intended to be element of the official welcoming party.
CNN has reached out to Buckingham Palace for clarification on the situations in the video clip but experienced not read a response by time of publication.
Princess Anne was also caught on camera alongside environment leaders who were being appearing to joke about Trump at the party in London last night.
That video clip appeared to demonstrate British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron, Canadian Primary Minister Justin Trudeau, Dutch Key Minister Mark Rutte and the princess laughing about the US President’s behavior all through the summit.
“Is that why you had been late?” Johnson questioned, right before Macron nodded and Trudeau replied: “He was late because he usually takes a … 40-minute press meeting at the best.”
“You just watched his team’s jaws fall to the ground,” Trudeau also appears to say at 1 stage, even though it really is not apparent which staff he was referring to.
Microphones could only select up snippets of the discussion at the reception, which the press was specified restricted entry to none of the leaders appeared to be knowledgeable that the dialogue was getting recorded. They were, having said that, chatting brazenly and loudly adequate to be heard by other people.
Canada’s Key Minister, Justin Trudeau, admitted Wednesday that he and other planet leaders ended up chatting about the US President. “Previous night time I created reference to the truth that there was an unscheduled push meeting in advance of my assembly with President Trump. I was delighted to be part of it but it was undoubtedly notable,” Trudeau explained through a Wednesday push conference.
Trudeau indicated that he wasn’t involved about his opinions influencing the US-Canadian connection, but Trump reacted angrily previously Wednesday calling Trudeau “two-confronted,” in advance of including, “honestly with Trudeau, he’s a awesome guy.”
As the United Kingdom faces the most momentous election in recent heritage, Scotland will be the scene of a intense battle that could have big outcomes for the foreseeable future of the union.
Pak Jong Chon, the main of team of the Korean People’s Army, stated that Kim was “displeased” by what he called “unwanted remarks” about North Korea produced by US President Donald Trump on Tuesday in London, exactly where he was attending NATO conferences.
Pak’s reviews occur amid a ratcheting up in rhetoric from the North Koreans in advance of the country’s self-imposed conclude-of-calendar year deadline for negotiations with the US.
A international ministry official claimed previously this 7 days that Pyongyang was getting ready a “Xmas reward,” for Washington, but warned that the current the Trump administration will get relies upon on activities in the coming times.
When Trump was questioned about North Korea’s new uptick in missile assessments and the standing of nuclear talks Tuesday, he referred to Kim as “Rocket Man” — a nickname the President coined through the standoff in between Pyongyang and Washington in 2017 — and hinted that his administration reserved the ideal to use force.
“We have the most impressive military we have at any time had and we are by much the most effective state in the planet. And, hopefully, we never have to use it, but if we do, we’ll use it. If we have to, we’ll do it,” Trump claimed.
Those reviews look to have rubbed Kim and the top rated North Korean management the improper way.
Substantial-rating North Korean army officials like Pak do not often difficulty public statements, and when they do they are usually centered on tensions in between North and South Korea, according to Michael Madden, an qualified in North Korean management at the Stimson Foundation.
Pak was just lately photographed alongside Kim on horseback touring Mount Paektu, an significant internet site in North Korean lore, frequently utilised for propaganda needs. That means it’s possible his assertion Wednesday carries additional excess weight.
Pak stated that though he regarded Trump connected preconditions when discussing the use of military services force against North Korea, the President’s feedback even now “significantly upset” him.
“These types of elated spirit and bluffing may perhaps tremendously get on the nerve of the dialogue husband or wife even at the slightest slip,” he said. “The use of armed forces from the DPRK will be a horrible detail for the US.”
Cracks in the friendship?
John Delury, a professor at Yonsei University’s Graduate Faculty of Global Relations, said the actuality that Pak introduced up Trump’s comments was specially about, and believes that Pak’s assertion was possible a reaction to Trump bringing back again the rhetoric that was typical in 2017.
“It can be just brief of Kim Jong Un himself saying it … but it is really acquiring incredibly shut to the stage where by Kim Jong Un claims form of instantly to Trump that I have missing religion in you,” Delury reported.
Diplomats from Pyongyang and Washington have been trying to negotiate a trade that would see Kim give up the country’s nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles employed to supply them in exchange for aid from punishing US and United Nations sanctions that have crippled the North Korean economic climate.
However North Korea to start with detonated a nuclear device in 2006, Pyongyang properly check-fired missiles that could probably hit the US mainland with a nuclear warhead for the very first time in 2017 — upping the stakes substantially and escalating the urgency to get to a peaceful remedy to a a long time-extended wrestle.
North Korea has this yr regularly blamed the US for the lack of progress in nuclear negotiations, singling out Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former Nationwide Protection adviser John Bolton for censure. Even so, Pyongyang has produced a notable effort and hard work not to criticize Trump and has emphasized the significance of the two leaders’ relationship.
Pak once again did so Wednesday in his assertion, indicating he thinks “the only guarantee that deters physical conflict from flaring up in relations concerning the DPRK (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea’s official title) and the US inspite of this sort of a perilous military services stand-off is the near relations in between the top leaders.”
North Koreans are especially delicate to any perceived insults directed at the ruling Kim relatives. Soon after previous Vice President Joe Biden termed Kim a dictator last month all through a marketing campaign rally, North Korea’s condition-operate Korean Central Information Agency printed a commentary calling him a “rabid dog” that “will have to be beaten to loss of life with a adhere, just before it is far too late.”
Even if Trump was joking when he brought back again a beloved nickname he utilised in advance of his budding friendship with Kim, the President may perhaps have been actively playing with fire.
Although some of the missiles might be classified as ballistic, the official emphasized that they are pretty quick array, without having giving much more facts.
The problem is the missiles could now be moved into parts the place they could be fired at US troops by Iranian-backed militias. Senior US armed forces officers, on the other hand, have mentioned recently that they will not feel the routine in Tehran is likely to go to war against the US.
In a linked growth, the formal explained that in the past month these militias have stepped up attacks against US positions with bigger rockets than experienced been observed just before.
The New York Instances was to start with to report the motion of missiles into Iraq.
Information of the movement of Iranian missiles into Iraq will come a day following CNN documented there is fresh new intelligence of a probable Iranian risk from US forces and pursuits in the Middle East, according to many US protection and administration officials.
“There has been steady intelligence in the previous numerous weeks,” just one administration official explained to CNN. A second formal described it as information that has been collected through November. The details is being collected by military services and intelligence agencies.
The officials would not say in what structure the intelligence exists. But in the past quite a few weeks there has been movement of Iranian forces and weapons that the US problems could be put in spot for a likely assault, if a single is purchased by the Iranian regime, the officials stated. It is really not very clear if a possible risk would come from the central federal government or Iran’s Islamic Innovative Guard Corps.
The head of US armed forces functions in the Center East not long ago signaled the US expects some variety of Iranian action in reaction to the US sanctions and strain campaign that is trying to get the regime to abandon its nuclear software.
“I would expect that if we seem at the past three or four months, it’s feasible they will do anything that is irresponsible. It truly is achievable that they will lash out at their neighbors,” Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, head of the US Central Command, informed an audience in Bahrain at the time. “It is not heading to be productive for them in the very long term to select to act out in the army area. That’s the information that we’re striving to convey.”
Officers have been adamant the intelligence has been gathered only as part of the constant checking by the US and has almost nothing to do with President Donald Trump’s political problems more than the impeachment inquiry. The intelligence has moved by means of qualified army and intelligence channels, and it is not apparent irrespective of whether Trump has but been briefed on it in element.
A view from St Rule’s Tower overlooks the town of St Andrews, Scotland.
St Andrews, Scotland —It’s a bitterly cold November day in the Scottish town of St Andrews, the kind of morning when the grass crackles underfoot like broken glass.
Undeterred, tourists swaddled in puffer jackets and armed with selfie sticks ascend the cathedral tower that has overlooked this coastal spot for 800 years.
From the top, gazing in one direction, the sea stretches towards Europe. Looking the other way, rolling hills lead to England.
As the United Kingdom faces its most momentous election in recent history, Scotland is grappling with which view to set its sights on.
For Scottish voters, a key issue in the December 12 general election will be whether, in the long term, they want to remain part of the UK or to break away and become an independent country.
“Independence is not about ‘oh we hate the English,’” says 22-year-old Scot and pro-independence campaigner Iona Fraser-Collins. “It’s about us wanting to be in charge of our own laws, and England being in charge of its own laws.”
Scotland rejected independence at a 2014 referendum, 55% to 45%. But circumstances have changed dramatically since then, according to the Scottish National Party (SNP) — the third-largest party in the UK Parliament.
In 2016 Scotsvoted overwhelmingly to remain in the European Union. Instead, they got Brexit – setting the country on a path it hadn’t agreed to and re-energizing the fight for independence.
In the event of a hung parliament –- one in which no party secures an outright majority — the pro-independence SNP could play kingmaker, potentially propping up a Labour government (they’ve dismissed the idea of doing the same with the Conservatives).
The SNP’s key condition for this would be securing a second Scottish independence referendum. It’s a prospect Labour hasn’t ruled out completely.
Support for Scottish independence has crept up slightly in the last five years and is nowneck-and-neck with those who favor remaining part of the union. With many seats in Scotland resting on razor-thin margins, this will be the scene of a fierce battle that could have major consequences for the future of the UK.
Student power
No battle will be fiercer than that fought in the constituency of North East Fife. This is the most marginal seat in the UK: In the 2017 election, the SNP won by just two votes against the Liberal Democrats.
Both the SNP and Lib Dems want to stop Brexit and both are fighting for pro-European voters. Their methods though, are starkly different.
The SNP believes an independent Scotland is the best way of staying in the EU; the Lib Dems say Scotland is stronger in Europeand in the UK.
The SNP currently controls 35 of Scotland’s 59 constituencies -– every seat they could gain in this election would strengthen their negotiating hand for an independence referendum.
At the heart of North East Fife is the university town of St Andrews.
It’s best known abroad as the place where Prince William started dating Kate, and as the “home of golf” thanks to the 600-year-old course that dominates the rugged landscape.
The town’s prestigious university also has a reputation, Scottish commentators told CNN, as the place where wealthy English and American students go when they don’t get into Oxford or Cambridge.
Students loom large here; cycling down pretty streets and teeming out of grand stone university buildings. They gather outside cafes handing out political flyers, all too aware that in a constituency where just two votes decided the winner last time around, they could make all the difference.
“It’s pretty unusual for there to be an election during term time,” says the university’s student president, Jamie Rodney, who has been part of a campus-wide drive encouraging young people to register to vote. “So students have a real opportunity this year to potentially swing the result of the whole election.”
‘Second class country’
Some, like the university’spro-independence union, are adamant about the direction they want that swing to take.
Every Tuesday evening the students meet at one of the town’s many traditional pubs. They come armed with clipboards and political buttons, eschewing pints of beer for tea and Coca-Cola.
A handful of the group were too young to vote in the 2016 EU referendum. Even those who did vote Remain feel they’ve been flung under a Brexit bus that is beyond their control.
“Brexit is just a prime example of Scotland getting the exact opposite of what it voted for,” says 24-year-old Harry Stage, his black curls bobbing with emphasis.
“When your mandate is not accepted, or your people are not listened to, then how can you want to stay part of that union?”
The students say Scotland feels like a “second-class country” where Westminster overlords dictate everything from their finance to defense policies. “We want to sit next to England at the table,” says Stage, “rather than in the back taking the scraps they can throw.”
They point to the UK’s Trident nuclear weapons, carried by submarines based on Scotland’s west coast, as an example of the “double standards” and “condescending nature” of Westminster lawmakers towards their country.
“You couldn’t do it in the Thames (in London) because it’s too much of a threat to human life,” says Stage. “But what’s a trident bomb going to do amongst lochs and glens and Glasgow.”
Scotland’s first minister and the leader of the SNP, Nicola Sturgeon, has said scrapping Trident would be one of her party’s key demands if Labour wanted its support in a minority government.
It’s a demand that’s unlikely to be met. Labour has pledged to renew the Trident program, despite its leader Jeremy Corbyn being a longstanding critic of nuclear weapons.
Of course, there’s no guarantee that an independent Scotland would automatically be welcomed back into the EU. Experts have warned that Spain – which is facing its own Catalan independence movement – may veto any attempt by Scotland to rejoin the bloc.
Indeed, the St Andrews students said the Scottish independence movement as a whole had been “very supportive” of Catalan activists, flying their flags at rallies and vice versa.
Regardless, Sturgeon is confident an independent Scotland would be readmitted to the EU. Even its national deficit of 7% (EU member states must have deficits below 3%) wouldn’t hold Scotland back, she told the BBC during a live leaders’ debate last week.
Instead, she said, the deficit would drop under an independent Scotland finally able to fully control its finances.
In any case, “we won’t be in the EU come January,” says Stage, in between sips of tea. “So, what do we have to lose?”
In another pub down the road, the SNP incumbent in this constituency, Stephen Gethins, rearranges himself on a plush red barstool. Like his young supporters, he opts for a tall glass of water over anything stronger.
In the last election here in 2017 Gethins won by just two votes, following three recounts, and admits “there was quite a lot of stuff going on at the time” given his wife had just had their baby the week before.
This election, Gethins sticks closely to the SNP script, saying Scotland’s departure from the UK would be nothing like England’s shambolic exit from the EU.
“It’s Brexit which is isolationist, which takes us into the unknown,” says Gethins. The nitty-gritty of what an independent Scotland would actually look like – its currency and border controls — are all laid out in the SNP’s 650-page White Paper, he says.
Critics meanwhile, have labelled the SNP blueprint“incoherent.”
Stronger in the union
On the other side of town, challenger and Lib Dem candidate Wendy Chamberlain is knocking on doors with her own small army of supporters.
Across Scotland, the Lib Dems’ vote share pales in comparison to that of the SNP – they hold just four of the country’s 59 seats, trailing behind the Conservatives and Labour.
This election, Chamberlain is banking on her party carving out a niche – attracting voters who want to stay in the EU, but don’t want a second referendum on Scottish independence.
She believes the same argument for staying in the EU, applies to staying in the UK. “We are better off in the UK with the relationships we have across these islands, as well as remaining in the EU and maintaining those relationships we have across the continent,” Chamberlain says, the sea breeze ruffling her long curly hair.
Chamberlain’s biggest challenge may simply be convincing voters in her own home. Her husband is an SNP member, though she’s quick to laugh off politically-induced marital strife.
Among those hitting the pavements alongside Chamberlain are students Joseph Luke, 20, and Alex Whitman, 21. Both are English, which they say “lends itself to unionism a little bit.”
They now live in St Andrews and “just because we were born in England doesn’t mean we don’t get a say,” says Luke.
He has relatives in both countries and says he doesn’t want to cross a hard border “just to see my family.”
Knife-edge margin
What makes elections in Scotland particularly nail-biting is the large proportion of marginal seats. Of the top 10 most marginal seats in the UK,four are in Scotland. Experts say that’s largely down to a four-party system not seen in England.
Even in a close constituency like North East Fife, some voters are still backing outside parties.
Student Lottie Doherty, 21, says she’ll be voting Labour because she supports staying in the EU and the UK, but believes the Lib Dem policy on revoking Brexit without a second referendum is “undemocratic.”
Labour came a distant fourth in the last election here. This year’s candidate, Wendy Haynes, says her party’s aim is to create a radically different UK, one that Scotland will want to be part of.
Meanwhile, kilt shop owner Robert Brown says he’ll be backing the Conservatives because they “support small businesses” like his. Most of Brown’s customers come from Scotland or America, where he says kilts are a popular choice for weddings.
He gets very little business from Europe, and he voted to Leave in the EU referendum. Despite the political turmoil of the ensuing three years, Brown believes Boris Johnson is the prime minister to finally deliver Brexit.
Surrounded by rows and rows of multicolored kilts, fox furs, and traditional silver brooches, Brown scoffs at the prospect of ever voting SNP.
Scotland isn’t traditional territory for the Conservatives. But in the last few years the party has made significant gains while Labour, which had triumphed here since the 1960s, lost huge swaths of voters to a reinvigorated SNP.
Even the North East Fife’s Conservative candidate, Tony Miklinski, admits that “Boris does alienate some Scottish voters.”
The Prime Minister is “easily portrayed as the cartoon character, Eton-educated toff who’s out of touch with the working class, and with the people of Scotland.”
But the “bottom line,” according to Miklinksi, is that a Conservative majority is the only way to resolve the “logjam in Westminster” and deliver Brexit. And ensure the SNP doesn’t get a second Scottish referendum.
With just over a week until the election, opinion polls are predicting a Conservative majority in the UK. That said, the polls predicted the same outcome in the 2017 election – instead, the Tories failed to achieve that majority.
Some, like 26-year-old fisherman Lee Gardner, still aren’t sure who they’ll vote for. Britain’s fishing industry has been vocal in favor of leaving the EU. Nonetheless Gardner voted Remain, and says he loves “traveling to Europe.”
“Anyway,” he adds with a cheeky smile, “I haven’t been a fisherman that long.”
Hauling lobsters onto his family’s boat in St Andrews’ harbor, Gardner stands on the cliff edge. Sea on one side, hills on the other, constantly moving between the two.
For the duration of the impeachment inquiry hearing, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) staunchly criticized Stanford Regulation College Professor Pamela S. Karlan’s comment involving the President’s son, Barron Trump.
What were you hoping for? To connect with someone, have a laugh and not spill any food down my white T.
First impressions? Nice hair, very warm and engaging.
What did you talk about? Work, how sweaty and hot we both get, Twitter, gym routines, being “woke” and the countryside.
Any awkward moments? None that I can remember.
Good table manners? Yes. Although we used our hands for certain dishes.
Best thing about Shaun? He is very comfortable in his own skin and beams positivity.
Would you introduce him to your friends? Yeah, sure.
Describe Shaun in three words Passionate, confident, friendly.
What do you think he made of you? Very smiley and talkative.
Did you go on somewhere? To a local pub for a couple.
And… did you kiss? No.
If you could change one thing about the evening, what would it be? I would change the seats, as they were uncomfortable for a long period of time.
Marks out of 10? 7.
Would you meet again? Sure, as friends. We exchanged numbers.
Shaun on Fiye
What were you hoping for? Good chat and lots of drinks.
First impressions? Friendly and frazzled.
What did you talk about? Our shared inability to return clothes, being a good ally, favourite pop icons, our different Uber etiquette, the pros and cons of different ages.
Any awkward moments? He had a bit of tissue stuck to his face and I didn’t know how to tell him. I was surprised when he told me he read the Daily Mail sometimes. When he ordered a shandy. I didn’t know how to explain Karl Marx when Fiye said he hadn’t heard of him.
Good table manners? Great. He always let me go first at the sharing plates.
Best thing about Fiye? Funny. We had lots of laughs.
Would you introduce him to your friends? My pals are lovely, and I’m sure they would get on if it ever came up.
Describe Fiye in three words Innocent, animated, inquisitive.
What do you think he made of you? Probably a big drinker.
Did you go on somewhere? We went to a cocktail bar. Fiye got a lemonade.
And… did you kiss? Nope.
If you could change one thing about the evening, what would it be? A date who I fancied.
Marks out of 10? 5.
Would you meet again? I would stop for a chat if we ran into each other.